Skip to main content
My junior theme focused on how the U.S. is falling behind in the global tech revolution. All around the world, advancements are being made with biotechnology, smart devices, nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, and more. However, the U.S. is not leading the charge in these disciplines, as the United States is ranked 21st in the world for overall internet speed (Ookla). This lack of leadership in the tech revolution is caused by lack of net neutrality regulations and the subsequent monopolistic nature of internet service providers (ISPs). 


When first researching for my junior theme, I was looking solely into net neutrality. This is because I thought that the question of why America lacks net neutrality rules has an answer deeply rooted in the history of our country. I thought that just because Ajit Pai repealed them. But after looking into the issue for long enough, my opinion of favoring net neutrality did not change, and I realized that my question was pretty shallow. I decided to have just one block focus on net neutrality, and then shift my overarching research into this question: Why is America falling behind in the global tech revolution? A lot of us (including myself two months ago) have no idea what this means. This issue of the global tech revolution was explored by Susan Crawford, Harvard Law School professor, whose two books I have frequently cited as well as a book talk she gave on one of them. She devoted years of her life to writing Fiber, which showed how giant corporations use their tremendous power to hold back infrastructure improvements (such as added fiber optic cable networks) that, if they weren’t held back, would allow for unimaginable industries and innovations. The prospect of certain technology in the future could radically transform health care, education, urban administration and services, agriculture, retail sales, and offices” (Crawford). Furthermore, many of us are oblivious to the monopolistic behavior of corporations that control cable and internet access. This was the most surprising information, because I was also oblivious to the fact that by refraining from competition and agreeing to large mergers, companies like Comcast feel that they have no reason to upgrade their services. This leads to slow internet speeds for high prices (or as high as consumers can handle), which many Americans consider just a part of life, while it is actually an effect of the cable industry monopolies. We must pass legislation ensuring net neutrality, break up large cable and internet service providers, and build more fiber optic cables across America. If we don’t, we will soon find ourselves decades behind other nations--our technology would be no match for other developed countries’ far superior technology. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Struggle for a Better World  Prior to reading Between the World and Me , I was under the impression that everyone collectively would be responsible for “the birth of a better world”. But when Coates tells his son that “a better world is not ultimately up to you,'' he is referring to the fact that it is ultimately up to the wealthy Americans in power that refer to themselves at white, and that young black men (like Samori) are not able to make such advances in life. In the beginning of the novel, the Ta-Nehisi Coates describes his recollection of an interview with a popular news show host. Coates says that she asked him about his body, but soon after asks about “hope”, as he discloses that “I knew that I had failed” (10). The news host is almost completely disregarding the words he had supplied for her previous question. His ideas of how America is and always has been white America don’t go through to her. She seems to be convinced that the prejudice towards African-Am...

Values

Humor While watching the NBC show Saturday Night Live over the weekend, I tried to force myself to find some value of American society conveyed through one of the skits. I wanted something obvious, like capitalism, equality, freedom, or maybe education. But as it went on, and as the actors & actresses poked fun at various aspects of our society, I came to realize that we value humor. I took an hour or two out of the day to watch this, along with everyone else in the country who watched it. The value of humor is evident on the North Shore and in American society as a whole. People today, especially those in the audience at SNL for example, may have certain feelings associated with what’s going on in political news these days. So when Beck Bennett (acting as Mike Pence) elaborated that the president is “meeting with an alligator breeder about filling in a moat at the border”, or when Michael Che explained that “Trump keeps sayin’ that there was ‘no quid pro quo’, which ...

Don't Catch You Slipping Now, Look What I'm Whippin Now

What comes to mind when you hear, “The American Dream”? Freedom? Opportunity? Wealth? Fame? While the American Dream was once about affluence and materialism, it is now considered to be the hope that any American has the opportunity and freedom to earn success if they work hard enough. This means that race and economic class do not play a role in achieving happiness. Success is when you achieve your goals, which means you consequently feel happiness. While many may gain wealth, they may not feel happy. Many are unable to achieve either. Nostalgia (a particular affection for the past) and materialism (the tendency to prioritize physical possessions over other aspects of life) are both large factors in The Great Gatsby and Between the World and Me . The corrupted, materialistic Dream of gaining wealth without happiness is demonstrated well in The Great Gatsby , and the fact that many Americans (specifically African Americans) are at a great disadvantage towards achieving the American D...